Multiwfn official website: http://sobereva.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn
You are not logged in.
Hello,
I have no experience in using the EFP feature in GAMESS. I suggest:
(1) Check if the wavefunction generated with EFP can be properly loaded into Multiwfn. Please check section "6.5 Check sanity of wavefunction" of Multiwfn manual.
(2) Plot electron density difference (EDD) between the wavefunction with and without the presence of EFP, and check if the EDD makes sense (i.e. properly reflecting the polarization effect caused by EFP). Please check Section 5.5 of Multiwfn manual on how to plot isosurface map of EDD.
If the above tests can be successfully passed, then you can normally perform other analyses on the wavefunction generated with EFP, including calculating electronic spatial extent.
Increasing number of grid point will not evidently affect the observed result.
Please take care of the calculation equation of Pauli potential used in Multiwfn (part 60 of Section 2.7 of Multiwfn manual). As you can see there are three component terms in the case of ispecial=0, you can individually plot them via Multiwfn to understand the detail. In which, Weizsacker potential (Vw) corresponds to iuserfunc=4, exchange-correlation potential (V_XC) corresponds to iuserfunc=1100.
BTW: Note that the position of nucleus is a singular point of the nuclear attractive potential in ESP, Multiwfn arbitrarily sets nuclear contribution to ESP at this point to 1000 a.u.
Because of approximations, such as approximated V_XC and finite-sized basis set, the resulting curve may not be well consistent with analyical solution.
In this case, your steps are correct.
In this way it is impossible to check if the Pauli potential is actually spherically symmetric. You should view isosurface map (via main function 5. Using isovalue of e.g. 0.7). You will find the isosurface is perfectly spherical.
Using iuserfunc=60 is correct. But as I mentioned, I cannot reproduce your observation, at least for Ar atom... More detailed information, such as input file, all commands you inputted in Multiwfn, the result, should be given.
Without description of your calculation steps in Multiwfn, it is difficult for me to make comment. I just tried, using Pauli potential (iuserfunc=53 with ispecial=0 or 1), to calculate grid data for Ar atom, the isosurface of Pauli potential is indeed fully spherically symmetric.
I am not an expert in this aspect, you may check EET review WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2018, e1392 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1392, and the EET keyword in Gaussian manual, which may be useful.
Hello,
You can use .molden.input files exported by orca_2mkl instead of the .fch files in this post.
.fch and .molden files provide essentially the same information for Multiwfn, see Section 2.5 of Multiwfn manual for more information.
There is no necessary contradiction. For example, MOLOPT basis set in CP2K is fully generally contracted, while it is used in combination with GTH pseudopotential. I suggest checking original paper of MOLOPT: THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 127, 114105 (2007).
I suggest changing to def2 basis set using "Extrapolate(3/4,def2) def2-QZVPP/C", the ECP should be automatically assigned for Rh.
Multiwfn doesn't directly support .dat file. For GAMESS-US users, one can obtain .wfn file from .dat file and then use it as Multiwfn input file, please check beginning part of Chapter 4 of Multiwfn manual on how to do.
After that, you can use Multiwfn to perform a wide variety of analyses, including calculating grid data of electron density around the interested region using main function 5, please check Section 4.5 of manual for examples. The region to be calculated can be flexibly defined, see Section 3.6 of manual about the different modes for setting up grids.
If your purpose is generating path from BCP, you should select option "8 Generating the paths connecting (3,-3) and (3,-1) CPs" rather than "9 Generating the paths connecting (3,+1) and (3,+3) CPs", the former doesn't need (3,+3).
It is not possible to use wB97X-D3(BJ) in G16, but ORCA supports it.
Hello,
This is no corresponding option, however, you can delete other type of CPs (option "-4 Modify or export CPs" and then "2 Delete some CPs") before printing out properties of BCP.
Also, note that in option -3 of topology analysis module there are suboptions "4 Save CPs to CPs.txt in current folder" and "5 Load CPs from a file", via them you can restore all CPs after deleting some of them.
Best regards,
Tian
As I noted earlier, this depends on how the surface is defined. If it is defined as isosurface of electron density, then "a" will be a constant for all atoms and all molecules, making the discussion completely meaningless.
Detailed description about these modes can be found in Section 3.6 of Multiwfn manual. The most convenient way is using option 10, by which you can visually setting up the box.
HELP and HELV, in their original paper, were used to characterize lone pair, it seems that you hope to use them to study bonding ELF basin, this might also make sense but I am not fully sure.
You may visualize other basins surrounding the An to try to identify their meaning, I think they should not be significant and thus can be ignored if your purpose is simply studying bonding.
By the way, to greatly save computational cost of basin analysis of ELF for large systems like this, you can properly define the box when setting up grid so that the box only cover the An atom and coordination atoms around it.
"amount of electric charge per unit surface area" is not well-defined. If one uses isosurface of electron density to define the surface, then electron density is the same everywhere on the surface. Statistics information of ESP over the surface is more meaningful and well-defined.
Dear James Kress,
Unfortunately, NPA analysis has not been implemented yet, I'm really too busy in recent years. But I *definitively* will make it supported in Multiwfn in the future.
Best regards,
Tian
The Multiwfn updated on 2025-Aug-3 supported this new feature:
Now Multiwfn is able to analyze wavefunctions of very high levels such as CCSD(T), CCSDT, MP5, etc. based on json file of ORCA 6.1. See updated Section 4.A.8 of Multiwfn manual for example.
Hello,
If you have .molden file of a crystal (usually generated by CP2K program), you can use Multiwfn to perform a lot of analyses; however, not all functions support periodic systems. The functions formally support periodic cases are explicitly listed in Section 2.9 of latest version of Multiwfn manual.
Hello,
I'm not willing to make any comment on the output generated by any AI (this is a complete waste of my time). Sorry...
I fully understand your situation. I just updated Multiwfn 3.8(dev) on the official website, now you can choose "13 Invert gradient vectors" in post-processing menu to invert the arrows on gradient lines.
BTW: Your image is very nice
I don't know what kind of map you plotted. Contour line + gradient line map doesn't have a scale bar.
If you are plotting "Gradient lines map with/without contour lines", you can multiply the ESP data by -1 so that the direction of arrows corresponds to electric field, and meantime changing plotting setting of contour lines to exchange solid and dashed styles.
Note that, for example, "C.wfn" should be "C .wfn"
Dear Dirk,
This doesn't need a new option. Just select option "-7 Multiply the current data by a factor" in the post-processing menu, and then input -1. Then if you plot the map again by option -1, you will find the arrow direction has been reversed.
Best,
Tian
I think the name of your atomic files is incorrect. Please exactly refer to the filenames in "examples\atomwfn\" folder. Also, the files should only be put into "atomwfn" subfolder in current folder. The "wfntmp" folder is automatically created by Multiwfn.
Dear Serhii,
For ORCA users, at the present, please just manually calculate all atomic .wfn files, and I suggest performing fractional occupied atomic .wfn file, in this case the somewhat artificial sphericalization is not needed. As an example, this kind of atomic .wfn file of oxygen can be calculated as follows
! B3LYP pcseg-1
%scf FracOcc true end
* xyz 0 1
O 0. 0. 0.
*
From the result you can see
SPIN DOWN ORBITALS
NO OCC E(Eh) E(eV)
0 1.0000 -19.223809 -523.1064
1 1.0000 -0.867475 -23.6052
2 0.3333 -0.233739 -6.3604
3 0.3333 -0.233666 -6.3584
4 0.3333 -0.233640 -6.3577
5 0.0000 0.800772 21.7901
6 0.0000 0.800840 21.7920
...
It is evident that the only one beta 2p electron uniformly distributes on the three 2p orbitals, that means this atomic .wfn file is in perfect spherical configuration.
Best,
Tian