Multiwfn official website: http://sobereva.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation and for pointing me to the relevant section of the manual.
Thank you very much for your reply and for sharing the details. I have followed the same method as you suggested and obtained almost the same graph. However, I observe negative values on the order of 10⁻⁴ near zero, along with some irregular behavior in that region.
If I want to change the number of grid points and the length of the radius, what is the correct way to do so? I suspect that increasing the number of grid points might help resolve this abnormality near zero.
Also, I apologize for these are very basic questions — I am quite new to using Multiwfn.
This is the Pauli potential graph I obtained by following the steps discussed above in Multiwfn. The other image I am attaching here corresponds to the Pauli potential obtained from my manual calculation. I would kindly request if you could try running the Pauli potential calculation for the Ar atom using the same procedure and share the results with me, so that I can cross-check my implementation.
Thank you for the suggestion. However, my intention is not to check whether the Pauli potential is spherically symmetric or not. What I actually want is to calculate the Pauli potential of atoms and molecules and save its values along the radial direction.
%mem=90mw
%nprocs=23
%chk=Ar.chk
# HFS/6-31G output=wfn Pop =full
gfinput gfoldprint iop(6/7=3)
title card
0 1
Ar 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
Ar.wfn
This is the Gaussian input file I used to run my calculation. After that, I loaded the Ar.fchk file into Multiwfn. From the main menu, I selected option 3 (“Output and plot specific property in a line”). Then I chose option 100 (“User-defined function (iuserfunc = 60), see Section 2.7 of the manual”).
After this, the following prompt appeared:
0 Set extension distance for mode 1, current: 1.5000 Bohr
1 Input index of two atoms to define a line
2 Input coordinate of two points to define a line
At this stage, I selected option 2 and entered the x, y, and z coordinates as 0,0,0, 10,0,0.
I have used this information given below on page 39 multiwfn manual Multiwfn_3.8_dev. 60 Pauli potential: V. Multiwfn supports two ways to evaluate this function, depending on
"ispecial" in settings.ini:
• ispecial=0: According to Eq. 17 of Comput. Theor. Chem., 1006, 92 (2013), V = + VESP − VXC
− VW, where is chemical potential (assumed to be zero by Multiwfn), VESP is electrostatic potential
(as described in Section 2.6) and VXC is exchange-correlation potential (its form is determined by
"iDFTxcsel" in settings.ini, see later).
• ispecial=1: Use original definition, namely ?θ = ?S − ?W = ??S
[?]/?? − ??W[?]/??, where VS is potential of non-interacting kinetic energy functional (S), and VW is potential of Weizsäcker
kinetic energy functional (vW). The form of S can be chosen by "iKEDsel" in settings.ini, see later;
currently only iKEDsel of 3, 5, 7 are supported
I have manually calculated the Pauli potential and electron density for atoms with spherically symmetric ground-state densities using data from Gaussian log files. To verify my results, I also attempted to calculate the Pauli potential using Multiwfn. I carefully followed the steps provided in the Multiwfn manual, but the values I obtained from the software do not match my manually calculated results.Could anyone please clarify the correct procedure for calculating the Pauli potential in Multiwfn?
Pages: 1