Multiwfn forum

Multiwfn official website: http://sobereva.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn

You are not logged in.

Pages: 1

#1 Quantum Chemistry » Question about units of first hyperpolarizability? » 2024-07-17 10:24:39

choconostle123
Replies: 1

Hello everyone i have a doub about the units of the firts hyperpolarizability, why the static first hyperpolarizability in some articles are reported in [10^-30 (cm^5)/esu] and in others are in [10^-48 esu]?

#2 Re: Quantum Chemistry » doubt about programing algorithm called "on grid method" » 2023-04-26 17:57:59

choconostle123

sorry is basin, I corrected it, oooo now I understand, thanks for your support i will train use a smaller grid spacing

#3 Quantum Chemistry » doubt about programing algorithm called "on grid method" » 2023-04-26 01:15:06

choconostle123
Replies: 2

hello everyone, i am learning to programing the algorithm called "on-grid method" to generate the basin, but i have a problem

i use the wave function of hydrogen molecule

my algorithm  correctly assigns most of the points to the basin of the hydrogen 1 and hydrogen 2 (the bcp is at (0,0,0), and my nuclear attractors in (0,0,+-0.584)) but in the plane xy where is the bond critical point (points like (0,2,0) (2,2,0) (1.8,2,0)) these kind of points are assigned to the basis of hydrogen 1 so when i want to integrating the density, the density in the basin of hydrogen 1 has major density than basis of hydrogen 2 because if use 41 points of size  in the end of my  algorithm hydrogen1 has 36141 points in the basin and hydrogen2  34460

so i don't know wath to do for improving my algorithm  sad

#4 Quantum Chemistry » A question about the linear response theory? » 2023-03-15 20:59:06

choconostle123
Replies: 0

I am studying linear response theory and i have a dub :S


if i have <Ψ(0)|O(interaction)|Ψ(0)>  ¿can i say that is the same that?  <Ψ(0)|O|Ψ(0)>


where Ψ(0) is the wave fuction in t=0 and O is and operator, O(interaction) is the operator in the interaction picture and O is the operator in the schrodinger picture

#5 Quantum Chemistry » Optimization with field » 2023-03-01 00:24:34

choconostle123
Replies: 1

Hello everyone, I have a problem with optimization with Gaussian with electric field
i want to get the wavefunction with the imput that is below but in the file .log don't converge the parameter maximum force:


Maximum Force                0.001404     0.000450     NO
RMS     Force                    0.000239     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.001001     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement         0.000265     0.001200     YES

i compute a optimization with AM1 and after that reoptimize with wb97x and finally i tried to carry on the optimization with electric field

can somebody help me?


Imput
######################################################################################
# wb97x/6-311g(d,p) opt=z-matrix
field=z+25 nosymm output=wfx

Title

0 1
C 
C   1 B1
C   2 B2 1 A2
C   3 B3 2 A3 1 D3
C   4 B4 3 A4 2 D4
C   1 B5 2 A5 3 D5
H   1 B6 2 A6 3 D6
H   2 B7 1 A7 3 D7
H   4 B8 3 A8 2 D8
H   5 B9 4 A9 3 D9
N   6 B10 1 A10 2 D10
C   11 B11 6 A11 1 D11
H   12 B12 11 A12 6 D12
H   12 B13 11 A13 6 D13
H   12 B14 11 A14 6 D14
C   11 B15 6 A15 1 D15
H   16 B16 11 A16 6 D16
H   16 B17 11 A17 6 D17
H   16 B18 11 A18 6 D18
C   3 B19 2 A19 1 D19
C   20 B20 3 A20 2 D20
C   20 B21 3 A21 2 D21
C   21 B22 20 A22 3 D22
C   21 B23 20 A23 3 D23
N   2 B24 1 A24 3 D24
N   2 B25 1 A25 3 D25
N   2 B26 1 A26 3 D26
Variables:
B1        1.37560
B2        1.40539
A2      121.86975
B3        1.40508
A3      117.26966
D3        1.95844
B4        1.37577
A4      121.48013
D4      358.75293
B5        1.41364
A5      120.84104
D5      359.06738
B6        1.08201
A6      118.60060
D6      179.33656
B7        1.08556
A7      118.45003
D7      180.53095
B8        1.08248
A8      120.72238
D8      177.22259
B9        1.08205
A9      118.41558
D9      179.11626
B10        1.36166
A10      121.39303
D10      179.73340
B11        1.45061
A11      120.14828
D11        1.16008
B12        1.09642
A12      111.72966
D12       61.40646
B13        1.08892
A13      109.11361
D13      180.79604
B14        1.09567
A14      111.51731
D14      299.90691
B15        1.45093
A15      120.22106
D15      178.83967
B16        1.09547
A16      111.44904
D16       59.54934
B17        1.08887
A17      109.04696
D17      178.60271
B18        1.09642
A18      111.76132
D18      298.02621
B19        1.45906
A19      119.44899
D19      181.09297
B20        1.36427
A20      128.48543
D20      159.33459
B21        1.44441
A21      115.69955
D21      340.11136
B22        1.43375
A22      121.32581
D22      178.10742
B23        1.43167
A23      123.77609
D23      356.41187
B24        5.20007
A24      117.64799
D24      342.65979
B25        5.90532
A25      162.72252
D25      350.93398
B26        3.48548
A26      157.23346
D26      147.09305

#6 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » dub TDM » 2022-11-27 01:06:26

choconostle123

Now I understand, thank you very much for the support and attention smile

#7 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » dub TDM » 2022-11-26 17:58:51

choconostle123

Hello one doub, i have a question in the expresion of TDM between ground state and a selected excited state K in the section 3.21.9 of the manual

imagen-2022-11-26-115005358.png

in this expression is need multyply by 2 ?

because for example i did a calculation with hydrogen molecule, the MO coefficients are

imagen-2022-11-26-115119418.png

and the coeficient determinant is 0.70711

the elements of the TDM that result with the funtion 9 of excited state are

imagen-2022-11-26-115330804.png

but the only way that i can get this results is for example the first with:

P_11=2*0.70711*0.548282599*1.21854048

#8 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » first hyperpolarizability and nonlinear absorption coefficient » 2022-06-14 17:21:06

choconostle123
Replies: 0

hello someone can i help with this question?

there is a mathematical way where can i relate the first hyperpolarizability result from gaussian with nonlinear absorption coefficient from the z-scan?

thanks for your attention

#9 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » NTO projections on atomic functions » 2021-03-09 04:26:54

choconostle123

Hi
I did a calculation in gamess with CIS and get the wavefunction in .dat

$CONTRL SCFTYP=RHF CITYP=CIS AIMPAC=.TRUE. $END
$SYSTEM TIMLIM=3000 MEMORY=3000000 $END
$BASIS GBASIS=N311 NGAUSS=6 NDFUNC=1 NPFUNC=1 DIFFSP=.TRUE. DIFFS=.TRUE. $END
$CIS NSTATE=10 ISTATE=0 IROOT=0 $END

after that i converted the file .dat to wfn so, i want to convert the natural orbitals in canonical and my question is: can i convert natural orbitals in canonical orbitals ?

#10 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » SOS computation of dipole hyperpolarizabilities » 2020-09-25 17:19:46

choconostle123

very grateful for the answer finally i can compare my values with the experimental values, and i want to comment a doubt in the meaning of the columns of the file beta_n because at difference with the file beta_n_comp in this file the meaning of each column appers but in the file beta_n don't appers i tried open with txt and opera (adjoint picture)
image.png

image.png

#11 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » SOS computation of dipole hyperpolarizabilities » 2020-09-17 23:27:45

choconostle123

Hi, first i want to thank for the program in the last days this program and the manual has helped me a lot, and i want to ask about, which value can i use of my output of SOS to compare with the experimental value? in the paper are reported beta(zero) in 9 esu (they extrapolated the experimental value measure at 1580 nm), i have in my output of SOS of beta(0,0) the next data (adjoint picture), but i don't know which value i have to converted to esu and copare with the experimental value
image.png

Pages: 1

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB