Multiwfn official website: http://sobereva.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Thank you for the clarification about adding labels manually.
I’d like to ask one more thing: in your publications, how do you decide which extrema points to show and which to omit?
Do you apply a threshold (e.g., only showing ESP values >±15), or do you choose a fixed number of top values (e.g., top 3 or 5 positive/negative)? Or is the selection purely based on visual clarity to avoid overcrowding the figure?
Also, do you filter those points manually, or do you use a script to select and reduce them before labeling?
In my case, for example, I noticed that in the previous reference pic (Fig. 1), the author displayed only 8 extrema values clearly and cleanly, while in my attempt (Fig. 2) using the same molecule, many values appeared — often overlapping or placed on top of each other.
So just to confirm: do you mean it’s fully optional for the user to select which extrema to keep and display, purely based on clarity and visual presentation, not necessarily based on a strict scientific rule?
Your advice would really help me finalize my figure. Thank you again.
Dear Prof. Tian Lu,
Thank you for your response.
As requested, I’ve attached figures to illustrate the problems I’m encountering:
Figure 1: This is taken from a reference article. The ESP extrema values are very clearly displayed, well separated, and placed on top of the surface, with labels such as “backside” and arrows used to indicate positions that are not directly visible. Global extrema are also marked with an asterisk *.
Figure 2: This is my result using the same molecule as in Figure 1, for comparison. As you can see, the labels are overcrowded, many are stacked on top of each other, and several are buried inside the surface, making them unreadable. Even limiting the display to top 3 or 5 extrema doesn't resolve this — they still appear unclear or inside the surface.
Figure 3: This is from another publication. This author displayed many extrema values, not just 8 like in Figure 1, but the figure remains clean and readable, with good use of spacing, arrows, and asterisks for emphasis.
Based on these comparisons, I would like to ask:
How can I achieve a clear figure like in these references, where extrema are clearly shown on the surface, not buried inside?
Do I need to limit the number of displayed values manually to avoid overcrowding, or is there a more systematic way to select which extrema to show?
How are elements like “backside” labels, arrows, and asterisks typically added — in VMD or via post-processing tools?
Any guidance or recommendations you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Dear Prof. Tian Lu,
I hope you're doing well.
I’m visualizing MEP mapped on the van der Waals surface using the suranalysis.pdb file. The colored potential surface, isosurface, extremas sheres, and CPK model all display correctly — but I’m having trouble with the clear visualization of the ESP extrema values, which I need for a publication-quality figure.
Here are the main issues and questions:
I’ve tried displaying all extrema, as well as only the top 3 or 5 positive and negative. But in all cases, the values either appear buried inside the surface or are overlapping heavily, making them unreadable and cluttered.
I’m unsure how extrema are typically selected for display in articles:
Based on threshold values (e.g., >±10, 15, or 20)?
Based on proximity to functional groups, heteroatoms, or hydrogens?
Or purely based on visual clarity?
Is the selection typically done manually (by removing or hiding labels), or is there a script-based way to handle it?
In some publications, I've seen the use of the “backside” label for certain extrema. When I tried this, the label appeared on all values — is it usually manually assigned?
Some articles show 2D arrows pointing to hidden extrema (e.g., on the rear side of the surface). Are these added inside VMD, or with external tools like Illustrator? Would that affect the image resolution?
I also attempted to use cones in VMD to point toward buried extrema but couldn't get it to work well — any advice?
For label coloring, should all values use a single color (e.g., black), or should positive and negative values be colored differently (e.g., red and blue)?
Everything else in the visualization looks good — the ESP zones, isosurface, and molecular model all render as expected. I just need guidance on how to clearly and selectively display the ESP extrema values to finalize the figure for publication.
Thank you very much for your time and support.
Best regards,
Hi,
I'm trying to follow this tutorial to visualize MEP on a van der Waals surface using VMD and Multiwfn:
? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFpDf_GimA0 But I got invalid command errors in VMD like iso, pt, and esp.
So I tried the second method, loading the files manually in VMD:
I exported surfanalysis.pdb, geometry.pdb, and mapfunc.cub from Multiwfn (from options 2, 5, 13).
I load them in VMD manually, but I have problems:
I can set isovalue to 0.001 or 0.002 in VMD
But the color scale range (e.g., -0.002 to 0.002) resets to 0 unless I use larger values like 0.01
The isosurface appears:
In one color only
Or with overlapping red/blue
Or broken with holes unless isovalue is ≥ 0.01
I tried different grid spacings in Multiwfn (0.2, 0.15, 0.1) — no success. Also tested VMD versions 1.9.1, 1.9.3, and 1.9.4.
Help Needed:
How to fix the color scale reset issue?
How to get a closed transparent red–blue surface at isovalue 0.001?
Is there a custom VMD version with iso, pt, esp commands like in the video?
Any working .tcl script or .vmd template for this setup?
Thanks in advance!
Pages: 1