<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=973&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / unrestricted wB97X-D and TPSSh functionals for paramagnetic species]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=973</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in unrestricted wB97X-D and TPSSh functionals for paramagnetic species.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:05:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: unrestricted wB97X-D and TPSSh functionals for paramagnetic species]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3730#p3730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t understand your problem. If you want to use PBE0 in Gaussian, just write PBE1PBE as keyword, see manual. If spin multiplicity is higher than 1, Gaussian automatically uses UKS formalism.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3730#p3730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: unrestricted wB97X-D and TPSSh functionals for paramagnetic species]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3729#p3729</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How can I use unrestricted version of PBE0-D3(BJ), wB97x-D or TPSSh for paramagnetic radicals? Thanks a lot!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Majumder.21)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3729#p3729</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: unrestricted wB97X-D and TPSSh functionals for paramagnetic species]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3724#p3724</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>PBE0-D3(BJ) is worth to try, which is very popular and robust in studying transition-metal complexes</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3724#p3724</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[unrestricted wB97X-D and TPSSh functionals for paramagnetic species]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3723#p3723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I want to explore an alkyl radical capture by a Ni(II) species and that would form Ni(III) complex which would eventually undergo C(sp3)-C(sp3) reductive elimination. I wanted to see how the optimized transition state would look like for those functionals (not single points) in gaussian16, except for the fact that I tried UB3LYP-D3 and UM06-D3 already. Any help would be appreciated.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Majumder.21)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3723#p3723</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
