<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=941&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Help with NCI analysis with integration]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=941</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Help with NCI analysis with integration.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3601#p3601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I Will do this sir, thank you very much</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brunosamp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3601#p3601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3597#p3597</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Both H-bond interaction and vdW interaction are evident for the two structures. If you only want to compare strength of H-bond, I would suggest using Multiwfn to perform AIM topology analysis to estimate H-bond interaction energy based on electron density at bond critical point of the H-bond using the relationship proposed in J. Comput. Chem. 2019, 40, 2868–2881, see Section 4.2.1 of Multiwfn manual for example.</p><p>If you want to study overall interaction strength, I would suggest directly calculating binding energy using quantum chemistry codes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3597#p3597</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3596#p3596</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear tian lu, i made a mistake while typing. <br />For the basal hydroxyl, i got a hydrogen bond interaction and a van der walls interaction as well. <br />NCI Isosurface:<br /><a href="https://postimg.cc/BjR9ZdN7" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/BjR9ZdN7/Basal.png" alt="Basal.png" /></span></a></p><p>Closest domain to the NCI Isosurface i got, which described very well the NCI isosurface.</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/rDV2Y1sg" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/rDV2Y1sg/dislin.png" alt="dislin.png" /></span></a></p><p>While for the edge hydroxyl, i got this nci isosurface (VdW interaction and the hydrogen bond with the edge hydroxyl):</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/3WfLH2tn" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/3WfLH2tn/Borda.png" alt="Borda.png" /></span></a></p><p>And this domain was the closest one i got:</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/5HH4nBKT" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/5HH4nBKT/dislin.png" alt="dislin.png" /></span></a></p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/tnb9qLRG" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/tnb9qLRG/dislin-1.png" alt="dislin-1.png" /></span></a></p><p>But in the nci, the hydrogen bond and vdw interaction are not separeted, like above. So, since the interaction with the edge hydroxyl is the strongest, i understand the integral value will not be well comparable with the integral value for the basal hydroxyl i showed above, i believe.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brunosamp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3596#p3596</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3595#p3595</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>one of the domains showed only the hydrogen bond interaction, and not the van der walls interaction</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I don&#039;t know how did you obtain this conclusion, please clarify this point</p><p>Also, it is best to show me the NCI isosurface map so that I can better understand your situation.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3595#p3595</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Help with NCI analysis with integration]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3594#p3594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I performed a nci analysis for a system of graphene oxide with a ammonia molecule interacting with the edge and basal hydroxyl.<br />In the NCI analysis, i observed that the interaction with the edge hydroxyl is described by a hydrogen bond region and weak van der walls interactions with the carbons near the hydroxyl. The same goes for the basal hydroxyl. <br />When i perform the integration for this structure, i got a list of domains. In the edge, one of the domains showed only the hydrogen bond interaction, and not the van der walls interaction. On the basal hydroxyl, i got a domain with the van der walls interaction and the hydrogen bond. <br />How can i get the exact same isosurface i got in the NCI analysis, when i do the integration?<br />Just to add context: the bond strength with the edge hydroxyl is higher than with the basal hydroxyl. But, with these domains i am getting, the integral of the interaction with the basal hydroxyl is higher than with the edge hydroxyl, which i understand it should be the opposite. <br />I used the default criterion for defining the domain (&lt;0.5).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brunosamp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3594#p3594</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
