<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=840&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Is there a testsuite that can validate the build?]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=840</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Is there a testsuite that can validate the build?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 05:44:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is there a testsuite that can validate the build?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3218#p3218</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>yurivict wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Hi Tian,</p><p>The source tarball has no file with the name CH3CONH2.fch<br />I found this file in the GitHub project <a href="https://github.com/stecue/gMultiwfn" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/stecue/gMultiwfn</a> but this project is outdated, it is not at version 3.8</p><br /><p>Yuri</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Dear Yuri,</p><p>You can find example files in binary package of Multiwfn.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 05:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3218#p3218</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is there a testsuite that can validate the build?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3217#p3217</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tian,</p><p>The source tarball has no file with the name CH3CONH2.fch<br />I found this file in the GitHub project <a href="https://github.com/stecue/gMultiwfn" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/stecue/gMultiwfn</a> but this project is outdated, it is not at version 3.8</p><br /><p>Yuri</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (yurivict)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3217#p3217</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is there a testsuite that can validate the build?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3216#p3216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Currently there is no test set to comprehensively test various functions of Multiwfn. You may perform some simple calculations, such as using main function 5 to calculate grid data of Laplacian of electron density for &quot;examples\CH3CONH2.fch&quot;, and compare &quot;Summing up all value and multiply differential element&quot; printed after calculation with that obtained by official windows or Linux version.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 20:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3216#p3216</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is there a testsuite that can validate the build?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3214#p3214</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve updated the FreeBSD port for Multiwfn: <a href="https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/science/multiwfn" rel="nofollow">https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/science/multiwfn</a> to 3.8</p><p>However, it isn&#039;t clear how to quickly verify that built binaries actually work.</p><p>Is there a test suite that can be run with a single command that can validate main features in built binaries?</p><p>For example, they typically add &quot;check&quot; or &quot;test&quot; target to Makefile that does this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (yurivict)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3214#p3214</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
