<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=838&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=838</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 05:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3206#p3206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot.</p><p>Regards,<br />Anjali</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Anjali Ganai)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 05:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3206#p3206</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3205#p3205</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>System2 has stronger overall hyperconjugation</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 02:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3205#p3205</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3204#p3204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Then how am I supposed to make comparison with other system since the other system also has a stabilization energy of 18.87 and 0.80 respectively for the same donor-acceptor pairs. <br />Added to this there are contributions involving s-orbital.<br />Here am giving an example of how the systems differ in their stabilization energy values.<br />System 1<br />donor--&gt;p-orbital = 11.23<br />donor--&gt;p-orbital = 9.06<br />donor--&gt;s-orbital= 4.83</p><p>System2</p><p>donor--&gt;p-orbital = 18.87<br />donor--&gt;p-orbital = 0.80<br />donor--&gt;s-orbital= 15.06</p><p>The donor orbital is the same in each case. It is a C-H sigma bond.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Anjali Ganai)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3204#p3204</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3203#p3203</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Anjali,</p><p>Both of them should be considered. However, the two values cannot be added together, there will be an overcounting problem.</p><p>Best,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3203#p3203</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3200#p3200</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I have carried out the second order perturbation analysis and a small section of the output is (showing the involved NBOs and Stabilization Energies):</p><p>21. BD(1) C 25-H 28&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;/121. LP*(7)Fe 30&#160; &#160; 9.06<br />21. BD(1) C 25-H 28&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;/122. LP*(8)Fe 30&#160; &#160; 11.23</p><p>Now NBO No. 121 and 122 are almost pure P orbitals as can be seen from below<br />121. (0.09383) LP*(7)Fe 30&#160; &#160; &#160;s(1.96%)p49.61(97.4%)d 0.30(0.60%)f 0.00(0.00%)<br />122. (0.08905) LP*(8)Fe 30&#160; &#160; &#160;s(1.16%)p84.81(98.31%)d 0.46(0.53%)f 0.00(0.00%)</p><p>My question is which of the two NBO(121 or 122 or both) should I consider? Do I need to add both values of stabilization energies (11.23+9.06) to make comparison with other systems?</p><p>Regards,<br />Anjali</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Anjali Ganai)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3200#p3200</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
