<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=816&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=816</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3116#p3116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Now it is very clear to me.<br />Thank you very much, sir!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brunosamp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3116#p3116</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3115#p3115</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Fermi level is not well-defined for molecule systems, since their HOMO-LUMO gap is generally not small, making the position of Fermi-level has a strong arbitrariness.</p><p>For ease of comparison of DOS/PDOS maps of molecular systems, you can simply shift energy levels so that HOMO occurs at E=0 position. In the DOS module of Multiwfn (latest version), you can find an option &quot;-6 Set shift of energy levels&quot;, after choosing it and inputting <em>H</em>, all MO levels will be shifted by -E(HOMO), and thus HOMO will exactly appear at E=0 in the DOS map.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3115#p3115</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3113#p3113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sir, you answer helped me greatly. Thank you very much! <br />Just one more question, if you could answer me. When i make a DOS/PDOS graph to three similar systems, i get graphs with the fermi energy in different ranges of temperature. I see many articles that present this fermi energy in zero. <br />The correct procedure is to normalize all my graphs to present a fermi energy=0?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brunosamp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3113#p3113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3112#p3112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The choice of the fragments has somewhat arbitrariness, I suggest:<br />1 COC<br />2 Only OH<br />3 COOH<br />Namely defining the whole functional group in common sense as fragment. In the paper, this definition should be clearly mentioned.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3112#p3112</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3110#p3110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am doing a PDOS graph for a graphene quantum dot (GQDs) molecule. This GQDs has hydroxyl, epoxy and carboxyl groups.<br />I don&#039;t understand how to define the fragments in my case:<br />1) For epoxy groups, should i include the carbons attached to the oxygens (C-O-C) or only the oxygens? <br />2) For the hydroxyl group, should i include the hydrogen of the O-H, and the carbon attached to this group, or only the oxygen?<br />3) For the carboxyl, should i include the whole COOH group, or only the oxygens?</p><p>This is important because it affects the PDOS graph a lot.</p><p>Thank you in advance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (brunosamp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3110#p3110</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
