<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=765&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / MRCC wavefunction analysis with ROHF reference orbitals]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=765</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in MRCC wavefunction analysis with ROHF reference orbitals.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: MRCC wavefunction analysis with ROHF reference orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2942#p2942</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I just updated Multiwfn on official website, now it can normally deal with ROHF reference density matrix.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2942#p2942</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: MRCC wavefunction analysis with ROHF reference orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2939#p2939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have sent the required files to sobereva[at]sina.com. Thank you in advance for checking the problem.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (benedek91)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2939#p2939</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: MRCC wavefunction analysis with ROHF reference orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2938#p2938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Zsolt,</p><p>I don&#039;t have experience in performing ROHF-CCSD via MRCC. It is best to send me the corresponding ROHF-CCSD input file, output file, molden file and CCDENSITIES via E-mail (compress them first), and it is better to also send me RHF-CCSD files for comparison. I will check.</p><p>Best,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2938#p2938</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MRCC wavefunction analysis with ROHF reference orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2937#p2937</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Multiwfn Developers,</p><p>I would like to analyze some CCSD wavefunctions which come from the MRCC program.<br />As described in the manual, I load the MOLDEN file, then the CCDENSITIES file with options &quot;1000&quot; and &quot;97&quot;.</p><p>For RHF reference, this works perfectly fine.</p><p>However, in the case of open-shell systems with ROHF orbitals, it seems that Multiwfn does not change the ROHF wavefunction when loading the CCDENSITIES file. For example, the Mayer bond order does not change compared to loading the original MOLDEN file (while for RHF, I can see a clear difference, as I expect.)</p><p>I also noticed that in the case of ROHF, the natural orbital occupation numbers do not appear when loading the CCDENSITIES file, even though the message &quot; Done! Basis function information now correspond to natural orbital cases&quot; is shown.</p><p>I suspect that the problem is that Multiwfn expects a CCDENSITIES file which contains alpha and beta blocks separately, but in the case of ROHF-CCSD, there are no blocks (that is the CCDENSITIES file looks similar to the RHF case.)</p><p>What can I do?</p><p>Best,<br />Zsolt</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (benedek91)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2937#p2937</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
