<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=745&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Wrong number of excited states detected in Gaussian output]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=745</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Wrong number of excited states detected in Gaussian output.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wrong number of excited states detected in Gaussian output]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2853#p2853</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian,</p><p>Wow! Thank you so much for your quick reply and that you even fixed it already. I also just tested it myself with the new version and it seems to work without any problems.</p><p>I really appreciate you work! </p><p>Best,<br />Joscha</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hochej)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2853#p2853</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wrong number of excited states detected in Gaussian output]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2852#p2852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Joscha,</p><p>I just updated Multiwfn on its website, a more robust way has been employed to determine number of excited states.</p><p>Best,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2852#p2852</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wrong number of excited states detected in Gaussian output]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2849#p2849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>First of all I would like to thank you for this great tool that you have created with Multiwfn. </p><p>I noticed that Multiwfn detects the wrong number of excited states (from Gaussian output) if one includes &quot;Excited State&quot; in the comment line of the Gaussian input file. I would guess that Multiwfn is counting the occurences of the &quot;Excited State&quot; string and thus expecting more states than are present in this special case. I think that Gaussian prints a specific line (see below) at the end of the excited states section, where the number of states are specified by the &quot;NState&quot; keyword. Perhaps it would be more robust to determine the number of states in this way?</p><p>The line looks in my case like:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>SavETr:  write IOETrn=   770 NScale= 10 NData=  16 NLR=1 NState=    8 LETran=      154.</code></pre></div><p>Below is a minimal example to reproduce the behaviour. I ommited the iop(9/40) argument for this example to get a smaller output. </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>%Chk=test.chk
%Mem=20GB
#p PBE1PBE/def2SVP td(nstates=4, 50-50)

Excited States

0 1
C      -3.83308417      -1.22708146      -1.26744875
O      -2.74075527      -1.63056230      -0.90488795
H      -4.73705813      -1.67301502      -0.86674069
H      -3.90175886      -0.42187415      -1.99099391</code></pre></div><p>The corresponding .fchk file was taken as the input to Multiwfn, I used the options 18 - 1 and specified the Gaussian output file as the input for the prompt. </p><p>Thank you very much in advance for your support.</p><p>Best regards,<br />Joscha</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hochej)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2849#p2849</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
