<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=652&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / chemical bond in excited states using Multiwfn and Orca]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=652</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in chemical bond in excited states using Multiwfn and Orca.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: chemical bond in excited states using Multiwfn and Orca]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2399#p2399</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rikaaardoss wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>So, from what I understand, there is no way to obtain the wave function of the system in the excited state T1, but I could only study it in T0.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>You should set both first and second states with weight of 0.5. Then both the states should be able to solve.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2399#p2399</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: chemical bond in excited states using Multiwfn and Orca]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2397#p2397</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So, from what I understand, there is no way to obtain the wave function of the system in the excited state T1, but I could only study it in T0.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rikaaardoss)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2397#p2397</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: chemical bond in excited states using Multiwfn and Orca]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2396#p2396</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Usually, to calculate excited state by CASSCF, you should use state-average treatment, otherwise due to variational collapse, despite you set initial weight of T1 as 1.0, the wavefunction may finally converge to T0.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2396#p2396</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[chemical bond in excited states using Multiwfn and Orca]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2394#p2394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, I am interested in analyzing chemical bonding in excited states using Multiwfn. For this I have done casscf calculations in ORCA, the system I am studying is triplet in its ground state (T0), however I am not getting the wave function of the first triplet excited state (T1), is there any way to obtain this function?, here is the input I am using: </p><p>! def2-TZVP def2/J<br />! moread<br />%moinp &quot;c2o_t.gbw&quot;<br />%MaxCore 20000<br />%scf<br />&#160; &#160; &#160;TolG 1.0e-04<br />&#160; &#160; &#160;TolE 1.0e-06<br />&#160; &#160; &#160;maxiter 500<br />end<br />%casscf<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; nel 14<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; norb 10<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; mult 3<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; nroots 3<br />&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; weights[1] = 1.0,0.0,0.0<br />end</p><p>%pal nprocs 10<br />end<br />*xyz 0 3<br />C&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000&#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000&#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000<br />C&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000&#160; &#160; &#160;-1.369900105&#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000<br />O&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000&#160; &#160; &#160; 1.162700089&#160; &#160; &#160; 0.000000000</p><br /><p>I figured I should change the weight of the state, so I would have this: &quot; weights[1] = 0.0,1.0,0.0 &quot;</p><br /><p>However, when I get the molden file and check the occupancies of the natural orbitals both files are very similar.</p><br /><p>Thanks advance for any help provided.</p><br /><p>R.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (rikaaardoss)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2394#p2394</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
