<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=648&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Implementation of incompete Gamma function]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=648</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Implementation of incompete Gamma function.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 00:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Implementation of incompete Gamma function]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2370#p2370</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>i.s.ger wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Is it time for density analyses during the SCF procedure? <img src="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p></div></blockquote></div><p>This is an interesting idea.</p><p>But I am unlikely to have time to write an efficient code for SCF iteration, this feature can at most be feasible for small systems.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 00:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2370#p2370</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Implementation of incompete Gamma function]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2369#p2369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian Lu,</p><p>Thank you for letting me to know that! &quot;subroutine incompletegamma(m, t0, f)&quot; is what I need.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>two-electron integrals will be fully available in Multiwfn.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Is it time for density analyses during the SCF procedure? <img src="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p><p>Best regards,<br />Igor</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (i.s.ger)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2369#p2369</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Implementation of incompete Gamma function]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2368#p2368</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Igor,</p><p>That function is not availble in native code Multiwfn, but I found &quot;subroutine incompletegamma(m, t0, f)&quot; in ryspoly.f90 is seemingly what you need. The ryspoly.f90 was introduced into Multiwfn in the version updated in the last few days. ryspoly.f90 is a part of libreta library.</p><p>By the way, the developer of libreta is trying to prepare an interface, when finished, two-electron integrals will be fully available in Multiwfn.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 20:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2368#p2368</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Implementation of incompete Gamma function]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2366#p2366</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian Lu,</p><p>Does MultiWFN have an implementation of incompete Gamma function?</p><p>I did not find its implementation in MultiWFN. Grepping in a bit outdated version of MultiWFN shows that output:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>$ grep &quot;incomplete&quot; * -i
grep: libreta_fast: Is a directory
grep: libreta_slow: Is a directory
grep: noGUI: Is a directory
grep: noGUI.old: Is a directory</code></pre></div><p>Best regards,<br />Igor</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (i.s.ger)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2366#p2366</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
