<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=62&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Pseudopotentials and Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld charges]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=62</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Pseudopotentials and Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld charges.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Pseudopotentials and Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld charges]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=200#p200</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I updated the code today again, please download the latest 3.6(dev) verison, the problem you mentioned has been fixed. I think currently the code should be almost perfect.</p><p>Thank you very much for helping me to improve the code of loading GAMESS-US/Firefly output files in recent days!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=200#p200</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pseudopotentials and Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld charges]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=198#p198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have seen that computation of Hirshfield charges from a wavefunction using pseudopotentials yields charges which do not take the &quot;missing&quot; core electrons into consideration : e.g. if a pseudopotential removes 10 electrons from 1st transition row metal, the final charge comes as (for example) 10.222&#160; rather than 0.222</p><p>Since these charges will naturally yield a dipole moment quite different from the one obtained with the &quot;full electron count&quot;, dos that mean that the Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld charges computed by multiwfn are meaningless for these pseudopotential computations?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (PedroS)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 16:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=198#p198</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
