<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=613&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Bader charge calculation]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=613</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Bader charge calculation.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Bader charge calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2201#p2201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sajal wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Thank you for your kind reply.&#160; I was wondering if we can have a big enough simulation cell and perform Bader charges for some atoms in the middle, would that work?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>It may work, you can have a try.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2201#p2201</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Bader charge calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2200#p2200</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your kind reply.&#160; I was wondering if we can have a big enough simulation cell and perform Bader charges for some atoms in the middle, would that work?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sajal)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2200#p2200</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Bader charge calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2199#p2199</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, this has not been supported yet, but will be supported in the future (maybe this year).</p><p>PS: Bader charge is not a good choice, it is not only very time-consuming but also poor. You may consider calculating 1.2*CM5 charge using Multiwfn based on .molden file of CP2K.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2199#p2199</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bader charge calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2198#p2198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How do I calculate the Bader charge in CP2K with the periodic system using multwfn?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sajal)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2198#p2198</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
