<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=570&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Local excitation and charge transfer]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=570</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Local excitation and charge transfer.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Local excitation and charge transfer]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2025#p2025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes I saw the corresponding paper in that section after I browse through the manual again thanks.</p><p>Regards<br />Louis-Charl</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Louischarlc0)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2025#p2025</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Local excitation and charge transfer]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2023#p2023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please carefully read the paragraph in your screenshot. The threshold is not excitation energy of 2.0 eV, but delta_r of 2.0 Angstrom, they are completely different. The corresponding paper (original paper of delta_r index) has already been mentioned in Section 3.21.4 of Multiwfn manual.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2023#p2023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Local excitation and charge transfer]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2022#p2022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It is on page 658 of the previous version of the manual.</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/67VWtDX9" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/67VWtDX9/multiwfn-snapshot.png" alt="multiwfn-snapshot.png" /></span></a></p><p>Regards<br />Louis-Charl</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Louischarlc0)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2022#p2022</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Local excitation and charge transfer]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2019#p2019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Louis-Charl,</p><p>Please provide a screenshot of Multiwfn manual of corresponding page. I suspect you misunderstood my statement.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2019#p2019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Local excitation and charge transfer]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2018#p2018</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Prof Liu</p><p>I notice in the multiwfn manual that there is a threshold for local excitations and charge transfer excitations e.g. local excitations is below 2.0 eV and charge transfer excitations should be above 2.00 eV. You also mentioned a full paper that states this. Can you please send me this paper where you got this information from?</p><p>Thanks in advance</p><p>Regards<br />Louis-Charl</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Louischarlc0)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2018#p2018</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
