<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=516&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=516</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 20:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1867#p1867</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thank you.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (icamps)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1867#p1867</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1853#p1853</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The units in both option 7 of topology analysis module and the unit in color-filled map are a.u.</p><p>It seems that you identified an incorrect CP.</p><p>I have reproduce your AIM analysis, as can be seen from the following map, the BCP between N86 and Ni121 is 390</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/HJwpxDm8" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/HJwpxDm8/1.jpg" alt="1.jpg" /></span></a></p><p>I checked its density, the value is 0.06968 a.u.</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/njdfjnPr" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/njdfjnPr/2.png" alt="2.png" /></span></a></p><p>Then I plotted electron density map for the plane defined by atoms 121, 86, 102:</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/5X5GQxHJ" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/5X5GQxHJ/3.png" alt="3.png" /></span></a></p><p>As indicated by the arrow, the BCP between N86 and Ni121 indeed has electron density of about 0.06968 a.u.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1853#p1853</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1851#p1851</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I check the CP number before making the comparison.</p><p>Also, after re-running all the calculations now, the CP number changes, but again, the values are different in the graph from the exported data.</p><p>Could you, check this for me, please? Could it be a issue with units? A difference between the units on the exported file and in the graph?</p><p>Thanks in advance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (icamps)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1851#p1851</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1845#p1845</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The CP389 is not between Ni121 and N86, but between N75 and H141, see below map</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/Wqrd87YJ" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/Wqrd87YJ/Clipboard01.jpg" alt="Clipboard01.jpg" /></span></a></p><p>Note that I just updated Multiwfn on the website, new improvement:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>In the GUI of topology analysis module, a new option has been added to menu: &quot;CP labelling settings&quot; - &quot;Labelling only one CP&quot;. After choosing it and input a CP index, e.g. 19, then only label of CP 19 could be shown when &quot;CP labels&quot; check box has been selected. This improvement makes finding a specific CP from topology map much easier for large systems.</p></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 18:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1845#p1845</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1844#p1844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p><p>I already sent the email.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (icamps)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1844#p1844</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: << Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1842#p1842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please send your wavefunction file to my E-mail, I will check</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1842#p1842</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[<< Values from critical points different from graphical properties >>]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1840#p1840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I did the critical point analysis, exported the file with all the data and also made the plots for the electronic density, its Laplacian, the ELF and LOL index.</p><p>When comparing the obtained data for bond critical points, between the text file and graph, they don&#039;t correspond, i.e. the value are different from the scale.</p><p>For example, from the calculation, the electronic density at the BCP389 (between Ni121 and N86) is 0.3246659890E+00. From the graph, the color should be cyan but it is blue (indicating lower density).<br />I checked the BCP number with the 3D plot with labels.</p><p>The same applies to ELF and LOL.</p><p>Text data:<br /> ----------------&#160; &#160;CP&#160; &#160;389,&#160; &#160; &#160;Type (3,-1)&#160; &#160;----------------<br /> Position (Bohr):&#160; &#160;12.26849825471668&#160; &#160; 6.06817862429313&#160; &#160;-3.47032776419174<br /> Density of all electrons:&#160; 0.3246659890E+00<br /> Density of Alpha electrons:&#160; 0.1623329945E+00<br /> Density of Beta electrons:&#160; 0.1623329945E+00<br /> Spin density of electrons:&#160; 0.0000000000E+00<br /> Lagrangian kinetic energy G(r):&#160; 0.6218513930E-01<br /> G(r) in X,Y,Z:&#160; 0.8830750583E-02&#160; 0.2785847921E-01&#160; 0.2549590951E-01<br /> Hamiltonian kinetic energy K(r):&#160; 0.3781322392E+00<br /> Potential energy density V(r): -0.4403173785E+00<br /> Energy density E(r) or H(r): -0.3781322392E+00<br /> Laplacian of electron density: -0.1263788400E+01<br /> Electron localization function (ELF):&#160; 0.9804412408E+00<br /> Localized orbital locator (LOL):&#160; 0.8762567777E+00<br /> Local information entropy:&#160; 0.3321890626E-02<br /> Reduced density gradient (RDG):&#160; 0.1000000000E+03<br /> Reduced density gradient with promolecular approximation:&#160; 0.1000000000E+03<br /> Sign(lambda2)*rho: -0.3246659890E+00<br /> Sign(lambda2)*rho with promolecular approximation: -0.2177479096E+00<br /> Corr. hole for alpha, ref.:&#160; &#160;0.00000&#160; &#160;0.00000&#160; &#160;0.00000 : -0.3880061880E-06<br /> Source function, ref.:&#160; &#160;0.00000&#160; &#160;0.00000&#160; &#160;0.00000 :&#160; 0.7122320441E-02<br /> Wavefunction value for orbital&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;1 : -0.3039836614E-05<br /> Average local ionization energy (ALIE):&#160; 0.6092467948E+00<br /> Delta_g (under promolecular approximation):&#160; 0.4398354939E+00<br /> Delta_g (under Hirshfeld partition):&#160; 0.7055014066E+00<br /> User-defined real space function:&#160; 0.1000000000E+01<br /> ESP from nuclear charges:&#160; 0.6067031133E+02<br /> ESP from electrons: -0.5945176577E+02<br /> Total ESP:&#160; 0.1218545568E+01 a.u. ( 0.3315831E+02 eV, 0.7646495E+03 kcal/mol) </p><p>Electron density graph:</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/r0dRfK1V" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/r0dRfK1V/BN-Ni-p4-06-Electron-Density-Color-filled-Map-Atom-Labels-vd-W.png" alt="BN-Ni-p4-06-Electron-Density-Color-filled-Map-Atom-Labels-vd-W.png" /></span></a><br /><a href="https://postimg.cc/DJFLw2Ln" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/DJFLw2Ln/BN-Ni-p4-14-ELFColor-filled-Map-vd-W.png" alt="BN-Ni-p4-14-ELFColor-filled-Map-vd-W.png" /></span></a></p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/YhVFmNYX" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/YhVFmNYX/BN-Ni-p4-18-LOLColor-filled-Map-vd-W.png" alt="BN-Ni-p4-18-LOLColor-filled-Map-vd-W.png" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (icamps)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1840#p1840</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
