<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=454&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=454</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:42:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1649#p1649</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian,<br />I performed calculations based on your instruction.<br />Interestingly, there is not any significant difference between two values. Indeed, whether employing the approach I described in &quot;My answer is:&quot; or using &quot;user-defined function #91&quot;, the values generated for d_g(IGMH,inter) are identical up to 5 decimal places.</p><p>Once again, too many thanks for your kind attention.</p><p>Sincerely,<br />Saeed</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (saeed_E)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1649#p1649</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1648#p1648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian,<br />Too many thanks for your kind attention to prompt reply with highly valuable and informative comments.<br />I will download the newest version and perform according to your nice instruction.</p><p>Sincerely,<br />Saeed</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (saeed_E)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1648#p1648</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1647#p1647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>saeed_E wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Dear Tian,<br />My answer is:<br />When we deal with a BCP associated with a non-covalent interaction, the contribution of intramolecular interactions can safely be ignored and, thus, the computed d_g(IGMH) at such a BCP can totally be related to the intermolecular contribution; d_g(IGMH, inter). Are you agree with my statement?</p><p>Sincerely,<br />Saeed</p></div></blockquote></div><p>The method described in #3 is the most rigorous way of evaluating delta_g(IGMH,inter) without any approximation, please use it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 05:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1647#p1647</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1646#p1646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have updated Multiwfn 3.8(dev) on Multiwfn website today, now Delta_g(IGMH,inter) has been added as 91th user-defined function. To obtain this quantity at BCP, you should:</p><p>(1) Set &quot;iuserfunc&quot; in settings.ini to 91.<br />(2) After loading input file into Multiwfn, enter main function 1000 (a hidden function), select option 16 to define two fragments.<br />(3) Use topology analysis module to find BCPs as usual.<br />(4) Use option 7 in topology analysis module to check properties of CPs of interest, the printed &quot;user-defined function&quot; is just the delta_g(IGMH,inter) between the two fragments.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 05:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1646#p1646</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1645#p1645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian,<br />My answer is:<br />When we deal with a BCP associated with a non-covalent interaction, the contribution of intramolecular interactions can safely be ignored and, thus, the computed d_g(IGMH) at such a BCP can totally be related to the intermolecular contribution; d_g(IGMH, inter). Are you agree with my statement?</p><p>Sincerely,<br />Saeed</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (saeed_E)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 04:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1645#p1645</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question about Delta_g(IGMH,inter)]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1644#p1644</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian,</p><p>Please, if possible, kindly let me know what is the easiest way to compute exact value of Delta_g(IGMH,inter) at the BCP of an NCI between two interacting fragment using Multiwfn?</p><p>In advance, too many thanks for your kind attention.</p><p>Sincerely,<br />Saeed</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (saeed_E)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1644#p1644</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
