<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=401&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Electron and Hole Distribution and Molecular Orbitals?]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=401</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Electron and Hole Distribution and Molecular Orbitals?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 08:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Electron and Hole Distribution and Molecular Orbitals?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3637#p3637</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the explanation and the suggestinos.&#160; I&#039;ll definitely look into the resources you shared.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (evetaylor)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 08:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3637#p3637</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Electron and Hole Distribution and Molecular Orbitals?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1390#p1390</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In many cases, there is no dominant MO transition in the excitation. For example, in practice, you may find HOMO-&gt;LUMO, HOMO-2-&gt;LUMO, HOMO-&gt;LUMO+1 contribute to S0-&gt;S1 excitation by 50%, 20%, 30%, respectively. Clearly in this case it is not possible to characterize the excitation by simply viewing one pair of MOs. Hole-electron analysis in Multiwfn provides significant conveniences, because for any electron excitation, this method is able to represent the excitation as a &quot;hole&quot; to &quot;electron&quot; transition, namely you can always intuitively understand the character of the excitation by examining hole and electron distributions (usually in terms of isosurface map). In addition, hole-electron analysis module is able to present rich quantitative information about the excitation, such as D index, Sr index, centroid position of hole and electron, exciton binding energy and so on, which are quite useful in quantitatively compare various electronic excitations. Please check introduction of the hole-electron analysis in Section 3.21.1 of the Multiwfn manual for more information, and you will recognize the power and usefulness of the hole-electron analysis by carefully following Section 4.18.1 of the manual.</p><p>A very good example is my publication Carbon, 165, 461-467 (2020) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.023" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.023</a>. As you can see from Fig. 4, S0-&gt;S21 excitation of the cyclo[18]carbon is nearly equally contributed by four pairs of MO transitions, while by using the hole-electron analysis, this complicated excitation can be exhibited as a single map very clearly, namely Fig. 6(b).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1390#p1390</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Electron and Hole Distribution and Molecular Orbitals?]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1389#p1389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am running some theoretical calculations on Organic Molecules. The calculations were based on Gaussian and Multiwfn. I just want to know the difference between the Molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) which were shown in the Gaussian software itself, and the electron-hole distribution. what is the advantage or information of hole-electron distribution of a molecule?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Mvr2301)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1389#p1389</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
