<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=303&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=303</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Overlap between specific orbitals.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 23:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1157#p1157</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a bug, sorry. I just updated the 3.7(dev) on Multiwfn website, now the result is correct.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 23:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1157#p1157</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1156#p1156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tian, thanks for your help as usual!</p><p>I used the subfunction 6 of main function 200 and the result for overlap integrals between square of orbitals are too high, for my system the overlap is 0.91 and the overlap of square is 0.93. I think there is something wrong...</p><p>I did other test with two .wfn files of alpha and beta orbitals respectively, and the overlap of square calculated with subfunction 6 of main function 200 is different than the result obtained with the subfunction 11 of main function 100 using just one file with alpha and beta electrons.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mbergami)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1156#p1156</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1151#p1151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have updated Multiwfn 3.7(dev) today, now in the subfunction 6 of main function 200, you can select option -3 to export Snorm2mat.txt in current folder, which contains overlap integrals between square of orbitals among two specific wavefunction files.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 04:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1151#p1151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1146#p1146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian,</p><p>I am trying to obtain overlap integral of square of the two orbitals from two wavefunctions files. I just know to calculate this overlap integral using function 3.100.11, in this case I can&#039;t use two wavefunctions files with this function. </p><p>In this case, is there some way to calculate the overlap integral of square of the two orbitals without to merge the two wavefunctions files?</p><p>Thanks for the attention,</p><p>Mateus Bergami</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mbergami)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1146#p1146</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=968#p968</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mateus Bergami,</p><p>I suggest you use subfunction 6 of main function 200, this function is able to directly calculate overlap (or overlap of norm) for orbitals in two different wavefunction files, therefore you do not need to find a way to merge the two wavefunctions files. Please check Section 3.200.6 of Multiwfn manual for introduction of this function.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 06:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=968#p968</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=967#p967</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this case, I modify the molden file of alpha electrons including the positron orbital and output the .wfn for this modified molden file.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mbergami)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=967#p967</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Overlap between specific orbitals]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=966#p966</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, </p><p>I need to calculate the overlap between two specific orbitals obtained with UHF calculation for a system compused by 10 water molecules, <br />one additional electron and one positron. In this calculation, I positioned GTF&#039;s for electrons on atom coordinates, and also a extra expansion center on origin (center of cavity). The GTF&#039;s positioned on atom coordinates (6-31G+(d,p)) and on origin (aug-cc-pVTZ) are different.</p><p>For the positron I positioned just one expansion center on origin with the same GTF (aug-cc-pVTZ) used for extra center of electrons. Therefore, the electronic wave function has different GTF&#039;s (6-31G+(d,p) and aug-cc-pVTZ) than positronic wave function (aug-cc-pVTZ). I have separate molden files&#160; for beta electrons, alpha electrons and the positron. </p><p>My question is:</p><p>Is there some problem to create just one .wfn file for alpha electrons and positron, and use this file to calculate overlap between alpha orbital with positron orbital using the function &quot;3.200.10 Output various kind of integral between orbitals&quot;? Is this function use the information of GTF&#039;s to calculate the overlap?</p><p>Thanks for the attention,</p><p>Mateus Bergami</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (mbergami)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=966#p966</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
