<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=296&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Negative sign of orbital overlap]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=296</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Negative sign of orbital overlap.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Negative sign of orbital overlap]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=951#p951</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You can simply ignore the sign of overlap, it is fully arbitrary. Only absolute value has practical value.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=951#p951</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Negative sign of orbital overlap]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=948#p948</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I´ve been working on some calculations of organic molecules, trying to obtain the orbital overlap between two fragments. However, for some dimers the overlap is negative (e.g. -0.15 in one case, but for other cases 0.15&#160; and 0.16). What´s the importance of this sign ? Or we just to worry about the absolute value (0.15, 0.15 and 0.16) of the overalp?</p><p>Thanks for your help</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (fnunez)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=948#p948</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
