<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=281&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Multiwfn ELF calculation]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=281</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Multiwfn ELF calculation.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Multiwfn ELF calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=887#p887</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I actually realized that I had added with Topmod a wrong symmetry. Maybe this thread should be deleted since my question arises from a mistake and is eventually not relevant to Multiwfn users.<br />Thank you for you quick reply, and thank you for the Multiwfn package which is really clear and user friendly!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (lmangin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=887#p887</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Multiwfn ELF calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=885#p885</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The first figure is evidently incorrect, the second one looks reasonable.</p><p>The definition of ELF in Multiwfn and Topmod for closed-shell cases is identical, however, for open-shell cases the result may be different (the one employed in Multiwfn was strictly derived by me in DOI: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20112786). Please check the ELF part in Section 2.6 of Multiwfn manual for introduction of the ELF. As mentioned in this part, Multiwfn also supports other variants of ELF.</p><p>There is a video tutorial that makes you quickly understand how to visualize ELF isosurface directly via Multiwfn and generate very pretty figure via ChimeraX based on cube file exported by Multiwfn:<br />Plotting electron localization function (ELF) isosurface using Multiwfn and ChimeraX<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/vC48iEB8PwI" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/vC48iEB8PwI</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=885#p885</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn ELF calculation]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=883#p883</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>I am a beginner on Electron Localization Function analysis and am practicing on the acetone molecule.<br />I generated the ELF grid with Topmod and with Multiwfn, using the same .wfn input file.<br />It seems like both softwares give different results wehn I vizualize the cubes with Molekel (see images attached: the surfaces with the 4 large spherical basins around the O atom has been generated with Topmod, and the other one with Topspin.</p><p>Is Multiwfn calculating the ELF in a different way? Or did I make a mistake somewhere when generating the grid ?</p><p>Thanks in advance.<br /><a href="https://postimg.cc/JGTqPdGq" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/JGTqPdGq/86480437-228848578147401-5772093681095933952-n.png" alt="86480437-228848578147401-5772093681095933952-n.png" /></span></a></p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/Whp8mPbz" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/Whp8mPbz/87034012-206958637362392-5366779751971160064-n.png" alt="87034012-206958637362392-5366779751971160064-n.png" /></span></a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (lmangin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=883#p883</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
