<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=250&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Localized Orbital Energies]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=250</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Localized Orbital Energies.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 02:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Localized Orbital Energies]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1143#p1143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dcjskea wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Hello again. I would like some advice please. I am successfully using Multiwfn to calculate localized orbitals and energies. However I am not sure if I am using the correct process for molecules that have an unpaired electron (unrestricted wavefunction) e.g. NO2.&#160; I have done localized energy calculations in such cases by combining the A Fock matrix with the B Fock matrix. Is this correct?&#160; The results show the A and B energies to be similar, but not the same. In some cases the A orbital is different from the corresponding B orbital. Can you give me any advice on the interpretation of the (different) A/B results?&#160; Thanks. Regards Donald.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>This is very normal situation. For open-shell case, spin polarization effect makes energies of alpha orbitals different to that of beta orbitals.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 02:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1143#p1143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Localized Orbital Energies]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1142#p1142</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello again. I would like some advice please. I am successfully using Multiwfn to calculate localized orbitals and energies. However I am not sure if I am using the correct process for molecules that have an unpaired electron (unrestricted wavefunction) e.g. NO2.&#160; I have done localized energy calculations in such cases by combining the A Fock matrix with the B Fock matrix. Is this correct?&#160; The results show the A and B energies to be similar, but not the same. In some cases the A orbital is different from the corresponding B orbital. Can you give me any advice on the interpretation of the (different) A/B results?&#160; Thanks. Regards Donald.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dcjskea)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 23:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1142#p1142</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Localized Orbital Energies]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=770#p770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Donald,</p><p>Please pay attention to this statement in Section 3.22 of Multiwfn manual:</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>The matrix elements should be provided in lower-triangular form, namely in this sequence: F(1,1) F(2,1) F(2,2) F(3,1) F(3,2) F(3,3) ... F(nbasis,nbasis), where nbasis is the total number of basis functions, the format is free.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Obviously, you don&#039;t need to carry out any mathematical transformation on the origin Fock matrix, you just need to ignore all F(i,j) elements whose j&gt;i.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Tian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 22:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=770#p770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Localized Orbital Energies]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=767#p767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is my first post. I am quite new to ab initio electron calculations. I am using Psi4 with Multiwfn. I am interested in localized orbital calculations on small molecules, giving meaningful information on chemical bonding structures. I am first of all testing the programs on a methane molecule. The visual results using Psi4 / Multiwfn give 4 (beautiful) tetrahedral localized bonding orbitals, but I run into problems when I try to calculate the energy.<br />My question concerns the Fock matrix in lower triangular form. Examination shows the Fock matrix to be symmetric about the leading diagonal. Is &quot;lower triangular form&quot; the same matrix with just the upper triangular entries removed?&#160; Or is &quot;lower triangular form&quot; the matrix after a gaussian elimination to make the upper triangular entries equal to zero?&#160; I would value your help. Regards Donald.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dcjskea)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=767#p767</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
