<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1845&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Emission for fluorescein-type dyes]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1845</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Emission for fluorescein-type dyes.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 17:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Emission for fluorescein-type dyes]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5730#p5730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If in the actual situation the anionic dye is able to tightly bind counterion (strictly speaking, this can be confirmed by molecular dynamics simulation), your treatment is fully physically sound.</p><p>I suggest checking what is the nature of the low-energy transitions (&gt;1000 nm) using hole-electron analysis in Multiwfn, which can provide valuable physical insight.</p><p>Also, don&#039;t forget to confirm that the reference state wavefunction is stable.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5730#p5730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Emission for fluorescein-type dyes]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5729#p5729</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tian Lu,</p><p>I&#039;m working on TD-DFT calculations of absorption/emission for fluorescein-type dyes (neutral and anionic forms), using wB97XD/Def2-TZVP with PCM.</p><p>For the neutral species, results match experiment very well. For the anionic species, however, I consistently obtain spurious low-lying excited states that do not match experiment, observing the appearance of some very low-energy transitions (&gt;1000 nm) that are not seen experimentally. Since this is an anion, I first tried adding diffuse functions to fix it, but this did not resolve the issue.</p><p>I have managed to reproduce the experimental results very well by explicitly including the positive counterion, giving the overall system a net charge of zero. While this reproduces the results, I have doubts about this methodology, since upon optimization the Na+/K+ always ends up close to the negative charge, and I don&#039;t believe this is representative of the actual state in solution.</p><p>Do you think this methodology is acceptable? Any additional suggestions? Any guidance or relevant references would be greatly appreciated.</p><p>Thank you in advance, as always, for your outstanding work.</p><p>Best regards</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (solan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 10:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5729#p5729</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
