<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1779&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Confusion between isosurface values and LUMO+x levels]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1779</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Confusion between isosurface values and LUMO+x levels.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Confusion between isosurface values and LUMO+x levels]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5541#p5541</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The 3D isosurface map you illustrated corresponds to orbital wavefunction, green and blue parts correspond to positive and negative phases, respectively. The contour line map of &quot;4 -&gt; 4 (Value of Orbital wave-function)&quot; directly corresponds to the 2D-map on the slice plane of this isosurface map.&quot;Orbital probability density&quot; is square of &quot;Value of Orbital wave-function&quot; (according to the well-known Born&#039;s probability interpretation of wave function).</p><p>The option &quot;5 Use built-in contour values suitable for special purpose&quot; is designed for quickly setting contour values for plotting specific kind of real space function. You can use it for convenience but it is never always needed.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5541#p5541</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Confusion between isosurface values and LUMO+x levels]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5535#p5535</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks sobereva, that cleared up the isosurface confusion. </p><p> I played around with the functions in 4, I have following findings</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://displ.nl/pb/LUMO_contours.png" alt="LUMO contours" /></span></p><p>First image is the LUMO plot from function 0, second is from 4 -&gt; 4 (Value of Orbital wave-function) and last one is 4 -&gt; 44 (Orbital probability density).</p><p>As you can see, the probability density plot is the one that matches the contour projections.&#160; (both are plotted in xy-plane with Z=0.5bohr). I have also tested the &quot;Special in-built function&quot; in the plotting menu, ie.</p><p># 3 Change setting of contour lines<br /># 5 Use built-in contour<br /># 3 For plotting orbital wavefunction</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://displ.nl/pb/LUMO_multiwfn_special.png" alt="LUMO inbuilt function" /></span></p><p>It seems to me, it just changed the value of Z.&#160; Is this the intended use case? </p><p>Thanks,</p><p>For clarification, I&#039;m running these Multiwfn 3.8 on *Linux machine.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hisacro)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 07:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5535#p5535</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Confusion between isosurface values and LUMO+x levels]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5534#p5534</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Section 3.5 describes plotting plane map (realized by main function 4 of Multiwfn), including contour line map. LUMO (or other orbitals) wavefunction is a 3D real space function, in order to plot it as a contour line map, you need to specify one or more contour values (Note that &quot;isosurface value&quot; or &quot;isovalue&quot; is only involved in 3D isosurface map, which can be plotted by main function 5).</p><p>Hope this clarifies enough.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 21:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5534#p5534</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Confusion between isosurface values and LUMO+x levels]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5531#p5531</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p><p>I&#039;m trying to contour plot the projections of the orbitals LUMO to LUMO+10. I looked up the manual section 3.5, especially the contour line maps. In this plot there is only option for contour values, I believe this is isosurface values but how this translates to LUMO levels?. I also get a message on the console when plotting, &#039;LUMO+9 levels&#039; are omitted to save memory. </p><p>I think I&#039;m missing something really fundamental inregards to understanding.&#160; In the end I want to plot the projections of 10 levels starting from LUMO but I couldn&#039;t find the options.</p><p>Thanks.</p><p>I&#039;m running version 3.8 Multiwfn</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (hisacro)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5531#p5531</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
