<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1661&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
		<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1661</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 17:21:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5084#p5084</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sobereva wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>After compiling source code, directly copying settings.ini from binary package to source code folder (or where you want to put Multiwfn).</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Oh, okay.<br />I wouldn’t have expected to need to do that, since it means I have to download both somehow.</p><p>Thanks!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ainosya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 17:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5084#p5084</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5083#p5083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>By the way, there is discrepancy between the output given by isuerfunc</p><p><a href="https://postimg.cc/21v2Jw8h" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/21v2Jw8h/Screenshot-from-2025-05-17-13-17-53.png" alt="Screenshot-from-2025-05-17-13-17-53.png" /></span></a></p><p>And the one returns by doing Multiwfn → 300 → 5 <br /><a href="https://postimg.cc/G95KmN4v" rel="nofollow"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/G95KmN4v/Screenshot-from-2025-05-17-13-18-40.png" alt="Screenshot-from-2025-05-17-13-18-40.png" /></span></a></p><p>The difference is not significant, but ideally, there should be no difference at all.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ainosya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 17:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5083#p5083</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5082#p5082</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>After compiling source code, directly copying settings.ini from binary package to source code folder (or where you want to put Multiwfn).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5082#p5082</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5081#p5081</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess my previous messages were unclear. I have version 3.8 and decided to switch to the source code package.</p><p>In doing so, I realized that neither the source code nor the settings.ini file needs to be modified, since this feature is already available in the code—although it&#039;s not mentioned in the manual for some reason.</p><p>However, since there is no settings.ini file in the source code package, I would like to know how to configure the user-defined functions in case I need to adjust them later</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ainosya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 17:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5081#p5081</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5080#p5080</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>settings.ini is in the binary package of Multiwfn, not in source code. You never need to modify or check source code.</p><p>After setting iuserfunc to 3, you need to reboot Multiwfn, and you need to make sure that there is no warning shown on screen indicating that Multiwfn didn&#039;t find settings.ini.</p><p>Please make clear how Multiwfn finds settings.ini.</p><p>3.8 Development version also has binary package. I strongly suggest using latest development version, and never using the out-of-dated version 3.7.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 16:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5080#p5080</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5079#p5079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I just realized that there&#039;s no need to modify the settings.ini file (which I could not find in the source code btw).<br />Launching Multiwfn → 300 → 5 returns the electronic spatial extent.<br />For some reason, this feature isn&#039;t mentioned in the manual — or did I miss it?</p><p>I discovered this while digging through the source code</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ainosya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5079#p5079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5078#p5078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, this is strange — I noticed that even though I set iuserfunc = 3, it still remains at 0.</p><p>So, I decided to use the development version instead of the binary one. However, I couldn&#039;t find where the value of iuserfunc is defined in the code. There is no settings.ini file when compiling the code directly.</p><p>Can you please tell me wehre the c80tmp (I guess) is defined so I can directly recompile the code. Thanks!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ainosya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5078#p5078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5075#p5075</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think you ran Multiwfn in a wrong way. Taking H2O as an example:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>%chk=C:\gtest\H2O.chk
#p hf/6-31G*

test

0 1
      O       -0.00000000   -0.00000000    0.11930800
      H        0.00000000    0.75895300   -0.47723200
      H       -0.00000000   -0.75895300   -0.47723200</code></pre></div><p>The &lt;r^2&gt; outputted by Gaussian is <br />Electronic spatial extent (au):&#160; &lt;R**2&gt;=&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;19.0512</p><p>If you set iuserfunc to 3, and boot up Multiwfn and load the .fch file produced by the above task, then run<br />100<br />4<br />100</p><p>You will obtain <br />Final result:&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;19.051245015<br />which is exactly the same as that outputted by Gaussian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (sobereva)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 22:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5075#p5075</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Discrepancy in Electronic Spatial Extent Between Multiwfn and Gaussian]]></title>
			<link>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5074#p5074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I am trying to obtain the electronic spatial extent using different software. To do so, I modified the settings.ini file in Multiwfn by setting iuserfunc = 3.</p><p>Multiwfn returns a value of 21092.4988259881, whereas my g16.log output gives 18436.6750. Is there a specific reason that could explain such a discrepancy?</p><p>I am unable to upload my files to the forum due to their large size, but could you please confirm whether my procedure for obtaining ⟨R²⟩ using Multiwfn is correct, or if I might be doing something wrong?</p><p>Thank you</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Ainosya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 16:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://sobereva.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5074#p5074</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
